COMPLETE REMOVABLE PROSTHETICS. A QUALITY IMPRESSION AS THE FIRST STEP TO SUCCESS, OR A MISTAKE THAT IS DIFFICULT TO CORRECT

Authors

  • I.М. Martynenko Poltava State Medical University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.35220/2523-420X/2024.1.4

Keywords:

сomplete, removable prosthetics, quality impression, success, mistake and difficult to correct

Abstract

Aims. To Evaluate distribution of professionals and facility types, impact of experience, challenges in impressionmaking and explore dental professionals’ perceptions of technological advancements’ impact on impressions for complete removable prosthetics. Material and Method. The study employed a cross-sectional design, in which a sample of 120 study population consisted of Dentists, Dental technicians, Dental hygienists using a simple random selection procedure was taken. A pretested structured questionnaire was used to collect information. Descriptive statistics were presented in frequency and percentages. Table and figure were utilized to present data. Chai square test was used for inferential statistics. Results. The current study on complete removable prosthetics examined various aspects related to professionals, techniques, challenges, consequences, measures, and technological advancements. Dentists constituted the largest group (37.5%), with diverse experience levels, primarily within 1-5 years (34.2%). Majority of respondents (60.8%) deemed quality impressions extremely or very crucial, emphasizing techniques like precise measurements and custom trays while highlighting challenges such as border molding difficulties (28.3%). Common consequences included poor fit of the prosthetic (24.2%) and patient discomfort (20%), with recommended measures including proper training (30.8%) and using high-quality materials (23.3%). While technological advancements were perceived positively by 59.2%, skepticism existed among 28.3% of participants. Notably, a significant association (p-value = 0.019) between experience and perceived cruciality of impression quality was found, particularly among practitioners with 1-5 years and over 10 years of experience, underlining the pivotal role of quality impressions in ensuring successful outcomes for complete removable prosthetics. Scientific Novelty. Revolutionizing complete denture success and prioritizing quality impressions for efficacy. Conclusion. The study highlights crucial role of precise impressions in complete removable prosthetics. Diverse expertise levels necessitate skillful techniques. Challenges like border molding require proactive measures and technological advancements for optimal outcomes.

References

Unveiling the Realm of Denture Fabrication: Revitalizing Aesthetics and Optimizing Efficiency for Geriatric Patients / A. Pathak et al. Cureus. 2023. URL: https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.50392 (date of access: 11.03.2024).

Is a two-step impression mandatory for complete denture fabrication on the severely resorbed mandible? A randomized trial on mastication, patient satisfaction and adjustments / I. S. Albuquerque et al. Journal of Dentistry. 2020. Vol. 99. P. 103357. URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2020.103357 (date of access: 11.03.2024).

Factors affecting patient satisfaction among patients undergone removable prosthodontic rehabilitation / M. A. Iqubal et al. Journal of Family Medicine and Primary Care. 2020. Vol. 9, no. 7. P. 3544. URL: https://doi.org/10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_120_20 (date of access: 11.03.2024).

Basics of Phoniatrics / L. Bartha-Doering et al. Phoniatrics I. Berlin, Heidelberg, 2019. P. 3–124. URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-46780-0_1 (date of access: 11.03.2024).

A Comparison of Accuracy of Different Dental Restorative Materials between Intraoral Scanning and Conventional Impression-Taking: An In Vitro Study / J.-H. Lim et al. Materials. 2021. Vol. 14, no. 8. P. 2060. URL: https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14082060 (date of access: 11.03.2024).

Accuracy of complete-arch implant impression made with occlusal registration material / E. Papazoglou et al. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. 2020. Vol. 123, no. 1. P. 143–148. URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2018.12.011 (date of access: 11.03.2024).

Evaluation of the quality of fixed prosthesis impressions in private laboratories in a sample from Yemen / N. M. Al-Odinee et al. BMC Oral Health. 2020. Vol. 20, no. 1. URL: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-020-01294-1 (date of access: 11.03.2024).

Development and Validation of a Questionnaire Evaluating the Impact of Prosthetic Dental Treatments on Patients’ Oral Health Quality of Life: A Prospective Pilot Study / E. Mijiritsky et al. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2020. Vol. 17, no. 14. P. 5037. URL: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17145037 (date of access: 11.03.2024).

Edentulous jaw impression techniques: An in vivo comparison of trueness / N. Chebib et al. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. 2019. Vol. 121, no. 4. P. 623–630. URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2018.08.016 (date of access: 11.03.2024).

12 problems we can correct to achieve the perfect dental impression – Dental Supplies and Equipment – Dentaltix. URL: https://www.dentaltix.com/en/blog/12-problems-we-can-fix-achieve-perfect-dental-impression (date of access: 11.03.2024).

CAD-CAM complete removable dental prostheses: A double-blind, randomized, crossover clinical trial evaluating milled and 3D-printed dentures / M. Srinivasan et al. Journal of Dentistry. 2021. Vol. 115. P. 103842. URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2021.103842 (date of access: 11.03.2024).

Hirayama H. Digital Removable Complete Denture (DRCD). Digital Restorative Dentistry. Cham, 2019. P. 115–136. URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-15974-0_6 (date of access: 11.03.2024).

Digital removable complete dentures: a narrative review – FJDM. FJDM – Translation of research into practice. URL: https://fjdentalmedopen.com/digitalremovable-complete-dentures-a-narrative-review/ (date of access: 11.03.2024).

Swelem A. A., Abdelnabi M. H. Attachmentretained removable prostheses: Patient satisfaction and quality of life assessment. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. 2020. URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2020.07.006 (date of access: 11.03.2024).

Sabir S., Regragui A., Merzouk N. Maintaining occlusal stability by selecting the most appropriate occlusal scheme in complete removable prosthesis. Japanese Dental Science Review. 2019. Vol. 55, no. 1. P. 145–150.

URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdsr.2019.09.005 (date of access: 11.03.2024).

Marinello C. P., Brugger R. Digital Removable Complete Denture–an Overview. Current Oral Health Reports. 2021. Vol. 8, no. 4. P. 117–131. URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40496-021-00299-1 (date of access: 11.03.2024).

3D printed complete removable dental prostheses: a narrative review / E. Anadioti et al. BMC Oral Health. 2020. Vol. 20, no. 1. URL: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-020-01328-8 (date of access: 11.03.2024).

The influence of prosthetic material on implant and prosthetic survival of implant-supported fixed complete dentures: a systematic review and meta-analysis / A. Bagegni et al. Journal of Prosthodontic Research. 2019. Vol. 63, no. 3. P. 251–265. URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpor.2019.02.001 (date of access: 11.03.2024).

Speech in implant-supported and removable complete denture wearers: A systematic review / I. A. Meira et al. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. 2021. URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2021.03.006 (date of access: 11.03.2024).

Biomechanical stress in removable complete dental prostheses: a narrative review of finite element studies / N. Jamayet et al. Journal of International Oral Health. 2020. Vol. 12, no. 5. P. 413. URL: https://doi.org/10.4103/jioh.jioh_190_20 (date of access: 11.03.2024).

Digital versus conventional complete dentures: A randomized, controlled, blinded study / S. Peroz et al. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. 2021. URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2021.02.004 (date of access: 11.03.2024).

Oh K. C., Jeon J., Kim J.-H. Fabrication of a removable partial denture combining conventional and digital techniques. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. 2020. URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2020.01.046 (date of access: 11.03.2024).

Nedumgottil B. A study to scrutinize the aspects concerning patient decision-making and dental prosthesis selection. Journal of Pharmacy And Bioallied Sciences. 2022. Vol. 14, no. 5. P. 518. URL: https://doi.org/10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_96_22 (date of access: 11.03.2024).

Reissmann D. R. Dental Patient-Reported Outcome Measures Are Essential for Evidence-Based Prosthetic Dentistry. Journal of Evidence Based Dental Practice. 2019. Vol. 19, no. 1. P. 1–6. URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebdp.2019.01.003 (date of access: 11.03.2024).

Fifteen-year survival of resin-bonded vs fullcoverage fixed dental prostheses / T. Yoshida et al. Journal of Prosthodontic Research. 2019. Vol. 63, no. 3. P. 374–382. URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpor.2019.02.004 (date of access: 11.03.2024).

Downloads

Published

2024-06-05

How to Cite

Мартиненко, І. (2024). COMPLETE REMOVABLE PROSTHETICS. A QUALITY IMPRESSION AS THE FIRST STEP TO SUCCESS, OR A MISTAKE THAT IS DIFFICULT TO CORRECT. Innovation in Stomatology, (1), 18–26. https://doi.org/10.35220/2523-420X/2024.1.4

Issue

Section

EXPERIMENTAL AND THEORETICAL STOMATOLOGY