RADIOGRAPHIC ASSESSMENT OF MAXILLARY SINUSES AND BONE REGENERATE FOLLOWING THE CLOSURE OF SCHNEIDERIAN MEMBRANE PERFORATIONS USING VARIOUS TECHNIQUES DURING SUBANTRAL AUGMENTATION

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.35220/2523-420X/2026.3.8

Keywords:

autologous fibrin glue, platelet-rich fibrin, collagen membrane, Schneiderian membrane perforation, local repair, maxillary sinus augmentation, maxillary sinusitis, radiographic examination

Abstract

Surgical closure of a Schneiderian membrane (SM) perforation occurring during an open sinus lift procedure prevents the migration of bone graft material into the maxillary sinus lumen and the subsequent development of inflammation. The use of blood plasma components with adhesive properties (such as PRF or fibrin glue) significantly enhances the efficacy of local repair using a collagen membrane and reduces the risk of postoperative complications. Research objective. To evaluate, using radiographic examination, the condition of the maxillary sinuses and subantral bone regenerates in patients who underwent surgical closure via various techniques of Schneiderian membrane perforations sustained during open sinus-lift procedures. Materials and methods. Radiographic examinations of the maxillary bones were performed on 20 patients (men and women aged 40 to 65 years) who had sustained medium- or large-sized Schneiderian membrane perforations during open sinus-lift surgery. All patients underwent radiographic monitoring of the maxillary sinuses and subantral bone regenerates using dental cone-beam computed tomography at 7 days, 3 months, and 6 months post-surgery. Based on the methods used for the plastic closure of maxillary sinus perforations, the patients were divided into two clinical groups: in the first group (9 individuals), defects in the maxillary sinus floor mucosa were closed using the resorbable collagen membrane “Ossix Plus” (Dentsply Sirona, USA), and the subantral regions of the maxillary bones were filled with the xeno-osteoplastic material “Cerabone.” In patients of the second clinical group (11 individuals), the surface of the “Ossix Plus” membrane was coated with autologous fibrin glue, and PRF was incorporated into the osteoplastic material at a 1:1 ratio. Results and Discussion. At 3 and 6 months postoperatively, radiographic imaging revealed thickening of the damaged maxillary sinus mucosa– varying in size–in 5 patients from the first clinical group who had undergone repair of large oroantral perforations. At this stage, slight thickening of the Schneiderian membrane was detected in only two patients from the second clinical group. The intergroup radiographic differences in membrane thickness at the 6-month follow-up mark approached statistical significance (χ²=3.0392, p=0.0813). Six months postoperatively, the intergroup difference in the incidence of marked vertical resorption (exceeding 20% of the baseline level) of the subantral bone regenerates was statistically significant (χ² = 6.1111, p=0.0134). Conclusions. Longitudinal radiographic monitoring of the maxillofacial region in patients who underwent open sinus lifting revealed that the severity of the postoperative inflammatory response in the maxillary sinuses is influenced by the method used to repair Schneiderian membrane perforations, while the efficacy of subantral bone regeneration in complex cases depends on the properties of the osteoplastic materials employed. The use of autologous fibrin glue and PRF for local reconstruction during maxillary bone augmentation– even in complex cases involving significant tears of Schneiderian membrane–enables the achievement of the necessary hemostatic and anti-inflammatory effects and ensures optimal conditions for reparative osteogenesis

References

Molina A. Sanz-Sánchez I., Sanz-Martín I. Complications in sinus lifting procedures: classification and management. Periodontology 2000. 2022. Vol. 88(1). P. 103–115. DOI: 10.1111/prd.12414

Tükel H.C., Tatli U. Risk factors and clinical outcomes of sinus membrane perforation during lateral window sinus lifting: analysis of 120 patients. Int J. Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2018. N 47(9). P. 1189–1194. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijom.2018.03.027

Delantoni A., Şengün D.N., Bayındır A., Orhan K. Risk factors, Consequences and Treatment Alternatives of Schneiderian Membrane Perforation: Case Report and Review of the Literature. ADO Klinik Bilimler Dergisi. Journal of Clinical Sciences. 2024. № 13(1). P. 256-263. DOI: 10.54617/adoklinikbilimler.1352345

Park W.B., Seol H.K., Shin S., Hong J.Y. Surgical Drainage and Simultaneous Sinus Floor Augmentation in Patients with Chronic Maxillary Sinusitis. Medicina. 2024. Vol. 60. P. 1256. DOI: 10.3390/medicina60081256

Youssef M.A, Krockow N., Pfaff J.A. Diagnostic reliability and accuracy of the hydraulic contrast lift protocol in the radiographic detection of sinus lift and perforation: ex vivo randomized split-mouth study in an ovine model. BDJ Open. 2024. Vol. 10. P. 6. DOI: 10.1038/s41405-024-00188-6

Robiony M., Tenani G., Sbuelz M., Casadei M. A simple method for repairing membrane sinus perforation. Open Journal of Stomatology. 2012. Vol. 2. P. 348 -351. DOI: 10.4236/ojst.2012.24059

Lee J-Y., Kwon J-J., Sandor G.K., Kim Y-D. Effectiveness of collagen membrane in the treatment of Schneiderian membrane perforation. Appl. Sci. 2019. Vol. 9 (7). P. 1514 -1516. DOI: 10.3390/app9071514

Devameena S., Dinesh D. S., Lakshmi Devi G., Shanmugavadivel G. Sinus Lift Procedures in Dental Implants: A Literature Review on Techniques, Recommendations, and Complications. Indian Journal of Dental Sciences. 2020. Vol. 12(3). P. 180-186. DOI: 10.4103/IJDS.IJDS_123_19

Xia L, Xu Z, Zou D. A retrospective comparative study of extensive sinus membrane perforations repairing using collagen membranes with pouch and nonpouch techniques. Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology and Oral Radiology. 2025. Vol. 139(2). P. 166-176. DOI: 10.1016/j.oooo.2024.08.019.

Gandhi Y., Kheur M. Modified ‘Cul-De-Sac’ approach for management of a large perforation during maxillary sinus elevation (a case report). J. Oral Biol Craniofac Res. 2020. Vol. 10(4). P. 407- 411. DOI: 10.1016/j.jobcr.2020.07.002

Касіян Д.В., Мокрик О.Я. Застосування медичних адгезивів для закриття перфорації мембрани Шнайдера під час відкритого синус-ліфтингу (огляд літератури). Український стоматологічний альманах. 2023. № 3. С. 32 – 37. ISSN 2409-0255

Salgado-Peralvo A.O., Garcia-Sanchez A., Kewalramani N., Velasco-Ortega E. Treatment of sinus membrane perforations during sinus lift surgeries using leukocyte and platelet-rich fibrin: A report of three cases. Journal of Clinical and Translational Research. 2022. Vol. 8(5). P. 360-368. DOI: 10.18053/jctres.08.202205.006.

Khoury F., Schmidt Ch., Jackowsk J. The influence of suturing and or gluing of perforated Schneiderian membrane during sinuslift procedure on the outcome: a retrospective study. International Journal of Implant Dentistry. 2024. Vol. 10. P. 48. DOI: 10.1186/s40729-024-00568-5

Shanbhag S., Karnik P., Shirke P., Shanbhag V. Conebeam computed tomographic analysis of sinus membrane thickness, ostium patency, and residual ridge heights in the posterior maxilla: Implications for sinus floor elevation. Clin. Oral Implant. Res. 2014. Vol. 25. P. 755–760. DOI: 10.1111/clr.12168

Nosaka Y., Nosaka H., Arai Y. Complications of postoperative swelling of the maxillary sinus membrane after sinus floor augmentation. Journal of Oral Science & Rehabilitation. 2015. Vol. 1(1). P. 26-33. DOI: 10.1111/cid.13086

Alston S.M., Solen K.A., Sukavaneshvar S., et al. In vivo efficacy of a new autologous fibrin sealant. J. Surg Res. 2008. Vol. 146. P. 143–148. DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2007.08.006

Dohan Ehrenfest D.M., Andia I., Zumstein M.A. et al. Classification of platelet concentrates (Platelet-Rich PlasmaPRP, Platelet-Rich Fibrin-PRF) for topical and infiltrative use in orthopedic and sports medicine: current consensus, clinical implications and perspectives. Muscles Ligaments Tendons J. 2014. Vol. 4(1). Р. 3 –9. DOI: 10.11138/mltj/ 2014.4.1.0013.

Wong K.W., Chen Y.S., Lin C.L. Evaluation optimum ratio of synthetic bone graft material and platelet rich fibrin mixture in a metal 3D printed implant to enhance bone regeneration. J Orthop Surg Res. 2024. Vol. 19. P. 299. DOI: 10.1186/s13018-024-04784-y.

Masri D., Jonas E., Ghanaiem O., Chaushu L. Schneiderian membrane perforation repair using a crosslinked collagen membrane: a retrospective cohort study. Head & Face Medicine. 2025. Vol. 21. P. 14. DOI: 10.1186/s13005-025-00487-9.

Bou Assaf R., Fayyad-Kazan M., Al-Nemer F., Makki R.,et al. Evaluation of the Osteogenic Potential of Different Scaffolds Embedded with Human Stem Cells Originated from Schneiderian Membrane: An In Vitro Study. Biomed Res Int. 2019. Vol. 2019. 2868673. DOI: 10.1155/ 2019/ 2868673.

Barbu H.M., Iancu S.A., Hancu V., Referendaru D., Nissan J., Naishlos S. PRF-Solution in Large Sinus Membrane Perforation with Simultaneous Implant Placement-Micro CT and Histological Analysis. Membranes. 2021. Vol. 11. P. 438. DOI: 10.3390/membranes11060438.

Aydinyurt H.S., Sancak T., Taskin C., Basbugan Y., Akinci L. Effects of ınjectable platelet-rich fibrin in experimental periodontitis in rats. Odontology. 2021. Vol. 109. P. 422–432. DOI: 10.1007/s10266-020-00557-1

Marchetti E., Mancini L., Bernardi S., Bianchi S. et al. Evaluation of Different Autologous Platelet Concentrate Biomaterials: Morphological and Biological Comparisons and Considerations. Materials. 2020. Vol. 13. P. 2282. DOI: 10.3390/ma13102282

Lechner J., von Baehr V., Doebis C., Notter F., Schick F. Platelet-Rich Fibrin (PRF) Analyzed for Cytokine Profiles – A Misguided Hope for Osteogenesis in Jawbone Defects? Research and Clinical Observational Study. Clinical, Cosmetic and Investigational Dentistry. 2024. Vol. 16. P. 467–479. DOI: 10.2147/CCIDE.S488206

Sun G., Cao L., Li H. Effects of platelet-rich fibrin combined with guided bone regeneration in the reconstruction of peri-implantitis bone defect. Am J. Transl Res. 2021. Vol. 13(7). P. 8397–8402. PMID: 34377334

Published

2026-11-11

How to Cite

Мокрик, О. ., & Касіян, Д. . (2026). RADIOGRAPHIC ASSESSMENT OF MAXILLARY SINUSES AND BONE REGENERATE FOLLOWING THE CLOSURE OF SCHNEIDERIAN MEMBRANE PERFORATIONS USING VARIOUS TECHNIQUES DURING SUBANTRAL AUGMENTATION. Innovation in Stomatology, (3), 50–58. https://doi.org/10.35220/2523-420X/2026.3.8

Issue

Section

DENTAL SURGERY