ASSESSMENT OF IMPLANT AND ABUTMENT TOOTH MOBILITY DURING COMPREHENSIVE ORTHOPEDIC TREATMENT

Authors

  • V.V. Lepskyi State Establishment “The Institute of Stomatology and Maxillo-facial Surgary National Academy of Medical Sciences of Ukraine”
  • V.N. Gorokhivskiy Odesa National Medical University
  • V.O. Rozumenko Odesa National Medical University
  • M.V. Rozumenko Odesa National Medical University
  • O.S. Nazarov Odesa National Medical University
  • A.V. Cherednychenko Odesa National Medical University
  • M.V. Pinkovskyi Odesa National Medical University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.35220/2523-420X/2025.2.18

Keywords:

dental implants; tooth mobility; Periotest; fixed bridges; comprehensive therapy; osseointegration

Abstract

The mechanical stability of dental implants and abutment teeth determines the longevity of prosthetic constructions and the success of rehabilitation in patients with bounded single- tooth defects. Objective mobility monitoring with devices such as the Periotest-S allows early detection of inadequate osseointegration and optimisation of treatment protocols.The purpose of the study was to evaluate the dynamics of implant and abutment tooth mobility during comprehensive prosthetic treatment supported by a therapeutic-preventive regimen. Materials and methods. A prospective cohort study was carried out in 57 patients (18–30 years) with bounded single-tooth defects. In the implant cohort (n=29), subgroup 1.1 (n=15) received comprehensive therapy, while subgroup 1.2 (n=14) received basic care only. In the three-unit metal–ceramic bridge cohort (n=28), subgroup 2.1 (n=15) received comprehensive therapy and subgroup 2.2 (n=13) received basic care. Periotest values were recorded at standardised intervals: for implants – 1, 3, 6 and 12 months post-implantation; for bridges–before and after fixation and at 1, 3, 6 and 12 months thereafter.Statistical analysis was performed in STATISTICA 6.1 using Student’s t-test (p<0.01). Research results. One month after implantation, the mean Periotest value in subgroup 1.1 was lower than in 1.2 (5.6±0.2 vs 6.2±0.2; p=0.05). The advantage of comprehensive therapy increased by months 3 (p<0.005) and 6 (p<0.001) and persisted at 12 months, when mobility in 1.2 exceeded that in 1.1 by 1.7-fold.In bridge patients, comprehensive therapy produced a significant reduction in abutment tooth mobility even before bridge fixation (2.8±0.1 vs 3.6±0.2; p<0.04) and ensured faster post-loading stabilisation. At 12 months, bridge mobility in 2.2 was 1.8-fold higher than in 2.1 (p<0.001).Conclusions. A therapeutic-preventive regimen combining antioxidant, anti-inflammatory and osteotropic agents significantly improves the stability of implants and abutment teeth, fostering faster osseointegration andlong-term functional stability of prosthetic constructions.The Periotest method is a sensitive tool for monitoring the effectiveness of comprehensive support throughout the prosthetic treatment pathway.

References

Karunanidhi K., Rajendran S., Mohan S., Saravanan P., Ariessairajan D., Jayanthi J. Decoding success: A five-year retrospective study of dental implant survival. J Oral Biol Craniofac Res. 2025. №15(5). Р. 948-954. DOI: 10.1016/j.jobcr.2025.06.021

Khalaila W., Nasser M., Ormianer Z. Evaluation of the relationship between Periotest values, marginal bone loss, and stability of single dental implants: A three- year prospective study. J Prosthet Dent. 2020. №124(2). Р. 183-188. DOI: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2019.08.023

Kovalyshyn A.Y., Dmytryshyn T.M. Periotest values of abutment teeth during prosthetic treatment with removable partial dentures. Actual Dent. 2023. №5(116). Р. 28-35. DOI: 10.33295/1992-576X-2023-5-28

Gerasimidou O., Watson T.F., Millar B.J. Evaluation of the Periotest device as an objective measuring tool for tooth mobility: A clinical study. Appl Sci. 2024. №14(5). Р. 1860. DOI: 10.3390/app14051860

Nastri L., Moretti A., Migliaccio S., Paoletta M., Annunziata M., Liguori S., et al. Do dietary supplements and nutraceuticals have effects on dental implant osseointegration? A scoping review. Nutrients. 2020. №12(1). Р. 268. DOI: 10.3390/nu12010268

Wang J., Zhang Y., Tang Q., Zhang Y., Yin Y., Chen L. Application of antioxidant compounds in bone defect repair. Antioxidants. 2024. №13(7). Р. 789. DOI: 10.3390/antiox13070789

Рогач І.М., Керецман А О., Сіткар А.Д. Правильно вибраний метод статистичного аналізу – шлях до якісної інтерпретації даних медичних досліджень. Науковий вісник Ужгородського університету. 2017. Вип. 2. С. 124-28.

Published

2025-07-07

How to Cite

Лепський, В., Горохівський, В., Розуменко, В., Розуменко, М., Назаров, О., Чередниченко, А., & Піньковський, М. (2025). ASSESSMENT OF IMPLANT AND ABUTMENT TOOTH MOBILITY DURING COMPREHENSIVE ORTHOPEDIC TREATMENT. Innovation in Stomatology, (2), 109–113. https://doi.org/10.35220/2523-420X/2025.2.18

Issue

Section

ORTHOPEDIC DENTISTRY