ASSESSMENT OF PROSTHETIC STATUS AND PREVALENCE OF MUCOGINGIVAL ALTERATIONS AMONG PATIENTS SEEKING FOR PROSTHETIC DENTAL HELP
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35220/2523-420X/2023.4.7Keywords:
prosthetic treatment, gingival margin, mucogingival disorders, prosthetic status, dental treatmentAbstract
Purpose of the study. To assess the prosthetic status of patients seeking prosthetic dental care and the prevalence of various forms of muco-gingival disorders among them. Research methods. The research was carried out on the basis of the Department of Prosthetic Dentistry at the University Dental Polyclinic of the Uzhhorod National University (Uzhhorod). The sample was formed from 405 patients who purposefully applied for prosthetic dental care. Classification of the prosthetic status of the patients of the studied sample was carried out according to the diagnostic approach and adapted coding of the World Health Organization. Diagnosis of muco-gingival disorders was carried out according to the classification of muco-gingival conditions, adapted from the consensus decision of the American Academy of Periodontology. Scientific novelty. The largest proportion of patients corresponds to the code “2” of prosthetic status (presence of more than one fixed prosthetic construction) presented by 138 persons (34,07%), while 96 patients (23,79%) despite the presence of dentition defects of various lengths and compromised structural and functional state of individual teeth didn’t have any type of denture. Different types of muco-gingival disorders were identified in absolutely all patients of the studied sample. The most common mucogingival disorders among the studied sample were gingival recessions diagnosed among 267 patients (65,93%) and irregularity of the gingival contour diagnosed among 226 patients (55,80%). Conclusions. The obtained data allow us to summarize that patients seeking for prosthetic dental treatment are characterized by a high prevalence of various forms of muco-gingival disorders, with the highest rates among being represented by gingival recession, irregularity of the gingival contour, thin biotype and deficiency of soft tissue volume. At the same time, the prevalence rate of various muco-gingival disorders was characterized by uneven growth with increasing age parameter of patients. A higher prevalence of mucogingival disorders was noted among patients with already present various types of prosthetic constructions compared to patients who did not have any type of dentures.
References
Does the Use of Surface Electromyography Could Improve Quality of Life among Patients Rehabilitated by Mandibular Overdentures on Different Attachments? / M. Fera, M. Goncharuk-Khomyn, O. Fera [et al.]. Pesquisa Brasileira em Odontopediatria e Clinica Integrada. 2022. Vol. 22. P. e210131-e210131.
Myroslav G. K., Andrii, K. Evaluation of Peri-Implant Bone Reduction Levels from Superimposition Perspective: Pilot Study among Ukrainian Implantology Practice. Pesquisa Brasileira em Odontopediatria e Clinica Integrada. 2018. Vol. 18(1). P. e3856.
Impact of different types of dental prostheses on oral-health-related quality of life: a prospective bicenter study of definitive and interim restorations / A. Winter, K. Erdelt, N. Giannakopoulos [et al.]. The International Journal of Prosthodontics. 2021. Vol. 34(4). P. 441–447.
Shah V. R., Shah D. N., Parmar C. H. Prosthetic status and prosthetic need among the patients attending various dental institutes of Ahmedabad and Gandhinagar district, Gujarat. The Journal of Indian Prosthodontic Society. 2012. Vol. 12. P. 161–167.
Determinants of dental prosthetic treatment need: A birth cohort study / L.A. Chisini, H.R. Sarmento, K. Collares [et al.]. Community Dentistry and Oral Epidemiology. 2021. Vol. 49(5). P. 394–400.
Characteristics of periodontal tissues in prosthetic treatment with fixed dental prostheses / A. Avetisyan, M. Markaryan, D. Rokaya [et al.]. Molecules. 2021. Vol. 26(5). P. 1331.
Fixed prosthetic restorations and periodontal health: a narrative review / V. Srimaneepong, A. Heboyan, M.S. Zafar [et al.]. Journal of Functional Biomaterials. 2022. Vol. 13(1). P. 15.
Digital protocol for creating a virtual gingiva adjacent to teeth with subgingival dental preparations / R. Agustín-Panadero, I. Loi, L. Fernández-Estevan [et al.]. Journal of Prosthodontic Research. 2020. Vol. 64(4). P. 506–514.
A New Definition of Attached Gingiva Around Teeth and Implants in Healthy and Diseased Sites / D. Tarnow, M. Hochman, S. Chu [et al.]. The International Journal of Periodontics & Restorative Dentistry. 2021. Vol. 41(1). P. 43–49.
Soft tissue grafting around implants: why, when, and how? / R.V. Abou-Arraj, A. Pizzini, P. Nasseh [et al.]. Current Oral Health Reports. 2020. Vol. 7. P. 381–396.
The biological width around implant / Z. Zheng, X. Ao, P. Xie [et al.]. Journal of prosthodontic research. 2021. Vol. 65(1). P. 11–18.
Cortellini P., Bissada N. F. Mucogingival conditions in the natural dentition: Narrative review, case definitions, and diagnostic considerations. Journal of periodontology. 2018. Vol. 89. P. S204–S213.
Global prevalence of gingival recession: A systematic review and meta-analysis / V. Yadav, B. Gumber, K. Makker [et al.]. Oral Diseases. 2022. Online ahead of print.
Dental prosthetic status and treatment needs of adult population in Jizan, Saudi Arabia: A survey report / S.A. Peeran, F. Al Sanabani, B.M. Al-Makramani [et al.]. European Journal of Dentistry. 2016. Vol. 10(04). P. 459–463.
Yanishen I. V. Assessment of fixed dentures quality. Ukrainian Dental Almanac. 2016. Vol. 1(1). P. 70–74.
Janishen I. Comparative evaluation of quality of dentures removable constructions during their clinical use. World of Medicine and Biology. 2014. Vol. 47(4). P. 76–79.
Prosthetic status and needs in patients visiting dental teaching hospitals of Peshawar / A. Hameed, S. Ihsan, M. Raza [et al.]. The Professional Medical Journal. 2019. Vol. 26(11). P. 1835–1843.
Dental Prosthetic Status and Treatment Needs of Adult Population in Makkah Region of Saudi Arabia: A Survey Report / K. Shetty, O. Wali, A. Koosa [et al.]. International Healthcare Research Journal. 2019. Vol. 3 (7). P. 240–247.
Baghele O., Bezalwar K. A study to evaluate the prevalence of teeth without clinically detectable mucogingival junction. Journal of Indian Society of Periodontology. 2022. Vol. 26(2). P. 162–162.
Non-Plaque Induced Diffuse Gingival Overgrowth: An Overview / D. De Falco, F. Della Vella, M. Scivetti [et al.]. Applied Sciences. 2022. Vol. 12(8). P. 3731.
Drug-induced gingival overgrowth in cardiovascular patients / L. Bajkovec, A. Mrzljak, R. Likic [et al.]. World Journal of Cardiology. 2021. Vol. 13(4). P. 68.
Shah R., Sowmya N. K., Mehta D. S. Prevalence of gingival biotype and its relationship to clinical parameters. Contemporary clinical dentistry. 2015. Vol. 6 (Suppl 1). P. S167.
Kim D. M., Bassir S. H., Nguyen T. T. Effect of gingival phenotype on the maintenance of periodontal health: An American Academy of Periodontology best evidence review. Journal of periodontology. 2020. Vol. 91(3). P. 311–338.
