PREDICTING THE RISK OF PERIIMPLANTITIS IN SUBANTRAL MAXILLARY AUGMENTATION

Authors

  • O.S. Shpahynskyi Institute of Postgraduate Education, Bogomolets National Medical University
  • A.V. Kopchak Institute of Postgraduate Education, Bogomolets National Medical University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.35220/2523-420X/2024.1.9

Keywords:

dental implantation, peri-implantitis, regenerative dentistry, bone grafting, lateral sinus lift fluor augmentation, upper jaw

Abstract

The study aimed to determine the frequency of dental implant loss (disintegration) in patients after open sinus lifting (OSL) for defects in the lateral maxillary area, and to identify risk factors for this complication based on multifactorial analysis and logistic regression. Materials and methods. The research involved 240 patients who received 517 dental implants after OSL (after 6 months). Factors considered included gender, age, smoking, time after tooth extraction, reason for tooth extraction, side and volume of operation, type of bone replacement material, residual height of the alveolar ridge, restored height of the alveolar ridge, and complications during OSL. Statistical analysis aimed to identify factors associated with an increased risk of complications in the early and late postoperative periods. For analyzing the risk of complications in patients with dental implants, univariate logistic regression model was built for each factor, as well as multifactorial analysis with ROC curves was conducted, using EZR (v.1.54). Results. The study included 240 patients with 517 dental implants, with women making up 54 % of the participants. Ages ranged from 29 to 71 years old (50.7±7,39), and 77 patients (32 %) were smokers. The distribution of implants was nearly even between the left (51 %) and right (49 %) sides. The leading cause of tooth loss was caries and its complications (69 %), periodontal tissue diseases (21 %), and dento-alveolar trauma (10 %). The residual height of the alveolar ridge before open sinus lifting was 1 mm in 80 cases (26 %), ranged from 1 to 2 mm in 117 cases (37 %), from 2 to 3 mm in 93 cases (30 %), and from 3 to 4 mm in 20 cases (7 %). After the introduction of bonereplacement material, directly before dental implantation, the restored height of the alveolar ridge made up 6-9 mm in 150 dental implant sites (29 %), and 9-12 mm in 367 sites (71 %). Among the osteointegrating dental implants with various thread pitches and widths, 233 (45 %) had a relatively “aggressive” thread, while 284 (55 %) had a “non-aggressive” thread. Bone replacement material used was xenogenic, made from deproteinized bovine bone in 278 cases (89.7 %), and autologous bone blocks in 32 cases (10.3 %). Out of 310 sinus lifting procedures, complications developed in 17 patients (7 %) in 21 operated sinuses. In 9 cases (3 %), adverse inflammatory processes led to the complete loss of the bone graft, necessitating repeated sinus lifting and delaying comprehensive rehabilitation. Dental implants (DI) were placed in the P2 (second premolar) area in 101 cases (20 %), in the M1 (first molar) area in 353 cases (68 %), and in the M2 (second molar) area in 63 cases (12 %). All implants were loaded using the traditional two-stage protocol six months after placement. Rejection/disintegration of dental implants was observed in 32 patients (13 %) in the early postoperative period or after loading (placement of prosthetic constructions), with a total of 43 instances (8 %). Conclusions. The study concludes that the logistic regression model based on the combined effect of risk factors (p<0.05), shows a very strong association (AUC=0.84, 95 % CI 0.78-0.91) with the factors, and can be used in treatment for patients with distal maxillary defects.

References

Proffit, W.R. (1994). Forty-year review of extraction frequencies at a university orthodontic clinic. Angle Orthod, 64, 407–414. doi: 10.1043/0003-3219(1994)064<0407:FROEFA>2.0.CO;2

Janson, G., Maria, FRT., & Bombonatti, R. (2014). Frequency evaluation of different extraction protocols in orthodontic treatment during 35 years. Prog Orthod, 15, 51. doi: 10.1186/s40510-014-0051-z

O’Connor, B.M. (1993). Contemporary trends in orthodontic practice: a national survey. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 103, 163–170. doi: 10.1016/S0889-5406(05)81766-4.

Peck, S., & Peck, H. (1979). Frequency of tooth extraction in orthodontic treatment. Am J Orthod, 76, 491–496. doi: 10.1016/0002-9416(79)90253-7

Weintraub, J.A., Vig, P.S., Brown, C., & Kowalski, C.J. (1989). The prevalence of orthodontic extractions. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 96, 462–466. doi: 10.1016/0889-5406(89)90112-1.

Woo, I., & Le, B.T. (2004). Maxillary sinus floor elevation: review of anatomy and two techniques. Implant Dent, 13, 28–32. doi: 10.1097/01.id.0000116369.66716.12.

Iwanaga, J., Wilson, Ch., Lachkar, S., Tomaszewski, K. A, Walocha, J. A, & Tubbs, R S. (2019). Clinical anatomy of the maxillary sinus: application to sinus floor augmentation. Anat Cell Biol, 52(1), 17-24. doi: 10.5115/acb.2019.52.1.17

Van den Bergh, J.P., ten Bruggenkate, C.M., Disch, F.J., & et al. (2000). Anatomical aspects of sinus floor elevations. Clin Oral Implants Res, 11(3), 256–65. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0501.2000.011003256.x.

Cawood, J.I, & Howell R.A. (1988). A classification of the edentulous jaws. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 17, 232-6. doi: 10.1016/s0901-5027(88)80047-x

Tatum H. (1986). Maxillary and sinus implant reconstructions. Dental Clinics of North America, 30(2):207-29.

Boyne, P., J& ames, R.A. (1980). Grafting of the maxillary sinus floor with autogenous marrow and bone. Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, 17, 113-116.

Aghaloo, T.L., & Moy, P.K. (2007). Which hard tissue augmentation techniques are the most successful in furnishing bony support for implant placement? Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 22, 49-70.

Habib, L. Abi-Aad, Fadi, I. Daher, Nadim, Z. Baba, Giampiero Cordioli, & Zeina A. K. Majzoub. (2019). Insertion Torque of Variable-Thread Tapered Implants in the Posterior Maxilla: A Clinical Study. J Prosthodont, 28(2), 788-794.

Wen-Yuan Chen, Xiang Chen, Xiao-Wei Lin, & Liang Xu. (2020). Analysis on the influencing factors of long-term survival of implants during lateral maxillary sinus floor elevation. Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue, 29(5):539-543.

Schwarz, L., Schiebel, V., Hof, M., Ulm, C., Watzek, G., & Pommer, B. (2015). Risk factors of membrane perforation and postoperative complications in sinus floor elevation surgery: Review of 407 aug‐ mentation procedures. Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, 73(7), 1275–1282. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2015.01.039.

Stacchi, C., Andolsek, F., Berton, F., Perinetti, G., Navarra, C. O., & Di Lenarda, R. (2017). Intraoperative Complications During Sinus Floor Elevation with Lateral Approach: A Systematic Review. The International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants, 32(3), 107–118. doi: 10.11607/jomi.4884.

Lorenz J., Korzinskas T., Chia P. & et al. (2018). Do Clinical and Radiological Assessments Contribute to the Understanding of Biomaterials? Results From a ProspectiveRandomized Sinus Augmentation Split-Mouth Trial. J Oral Implantol. 44(1), 62-69. doi: 10.1563/aaidjoi-D-17-00139.

Derks, J., & Tomasi, C. (2015). Peri‐implant health and disease. A systematic review of current epidemiology. Journal of Clinical Periodontology, 42(16), 158–171. doi: 10.1111/jcpe.12334.

Al-Faraje, L. (2011). Surgical Complications in Oral Implantology, First. ed, Quintessence. Hanover Park 20. Chen, Y.-W., Lee, F.-Y., Chang, P.-Ch.,

Huang, Ch.-Ch., Fu Ch.-H. & et al. (2018). A paradigm for evaluation and management of the maxillary sinus before dental implantation. Laryngscope, 128(6): 1261–1267. doi: 10.1002/lary.26856.

Kanda, Y. (2013). Investigation of the freely available easy-to-use software ‘EZR’ for medical statistics. Bone Marrow Transplant, 48, 452–458. doi: 10.1038/bmt.2012.244.

Chanavaz, M. (2000). Sinus graft procedures and implant dentistry: a review of 21 years of surgical experience 1979-2000. Implant Dent., 9(3), 197-200.

Pabst A. M., Walter C., Ehbauer S., Zwiener I., Ziebart T. Al-Nawas B., & Klein M. O. (2015). Analysis of implant-failure predictors in the posterior maxilla: a retrospective study of 1395 implants. J Craniomaxillofac Surg., 43(3), 414-20.

Jensen, S. S., Aaboe, M., Pinholt, E Hjørting-Hansen E. M., Melsen, F., & Tissue, I. E. (1996). Tissue reaction and material characteristics of four bone substitutes. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 11(1), 55-66.

Khoury F. (1999). Augmentation of the sinus floor with mandibular bone block and simultaneous implantation: a 6-year clinical investigation. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 14(4), 557-64.

Guy Huynh-Ba, Friedberg, J.R, Vogiatzi, & Ioannidou, D. E., (2008). Implant failure predictors in the posterior maxilla: a retrospective study of 273 consecutive implants. J Periodontol, 79(12), 2256-61. doi: 10.1902/jop.2008.070602

Zinser, M. J., Randelzhofer, P., Kuiper, L., Zöller, J.E., & Gert L De Lange. (2013). The predictors of implant failure after maxillary sinus floor augmentation and reconstruction: a retrospective study of 1045 consecutive implants. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol, 115(5), 571-82. doi: 10.1016/j.oooo.2012.06.015

Michael M Bornstein, Vivianne Chappuis, Thomas von Arx, & Daniel Buser. (2008). Performance of dental implants after staged sinus floor elevation procedures: 5-year results of a prospective study in partially edentulous patients. Clin Oral Implants Res, 19(10), 1034-43. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2008.01573.x.

Daniel van Steenberghe, Reinhilde Jacobs, Mandy Desnyder, Gaia Maffei, & Marc Quirynen. (2002). The relative impact of local and endogenous patient-related factors on implant failure up to the abutment stage. Clin Oral Implants Res, 13(6), 617-22. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0501.2002.130607.x

Huajie Yu, Xing Wang, & Lixin Qiu. (2017). Outcomes of 6.5-mm Hydrophilic Implants and Long Implants Placed with Lateral Sinus Floor Elevation in the Atrophic Posterior Maxilla: A Prospective, Randomized Controlled Clinical Comparison. Randomized Controlled Trial Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 19(1), 111-122. doi: 10.1111/cid.12439

Lorenz, J., Korzinskas, T., Chia, P., Sarah Al Maawi, Eichler, K., Sader, R., A., & Ghanaati, S. (2018). Do Clinical and Radiological Assessments Contribute to the Understanding of Biomaterials? Results From a Prospective Randomized Sinus Augmentation Split-Mouth Trial. J Oral Implantol, 44(1), 62-69. doi: 10.1563/aaidjoi-D-17-00139.

Younes, F., Eghbali, A., Troyer, S. De., Bruyckere, T. De., R Cleymaet, & Cosyn, J. (2016). Marginal and apical bone stability after staged sinus floor augmentation using bone condensing implants with variable-thread design: a two-dimensional analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 45(9), 1135-41. doi: 10.1016/j.ijom.2016.04.012

Published

2024-06-05

How to Cite

Шпачинський, О., & Копчак, А. (2024). PREDICTING THE RISK OF PERIIMPLANTITIS IN SUBANTRAL MAXILLARY AUGMENTATION. Innovation in Stomatology, (1), 57–67. https://doi.org/10.35220/2523-420X/2024.1.9

Issue

Section

DENTAL SURGERY