EXPERIMENTAL EVALUATION OF BIOCHEMICAL MARKERS OF INFLAMMATION IN RAT GINGIVAL HOMOGENATES IN THE CONTEXT OF IMPLANT FIXATION AND THERAPEUTICPROPHYLACTIC MEASURES
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35220/2523-420X/2024.1.1Keywords:
implants, gums, rats, experiment, biochemical markersAbstract
The purpose of this study. Evaluation of the effect of a therapeutic complex of drugs on markers of inflammation in rat gum homogenates after implant fixation. Material and research methods. Experimental studies were conducted, during which 45 male rats of 7 months of age were used, with an average weight of 340-370 G. the implant was fixed to Animals of the experimental groups under thiopental anesthesia. Markers of inflammation – elastase and acid phosphatase activity-were determined in gum homogenates. After fixing the implant the next day, the experimental animals were orally administered a complex of drugs in the form of suspensions, which had antiinflammatory, antioxidant and anti-dysbiotic properties, and the control group was injected with water in the same volume. The animals were divided into 3 groups: intact; control with implant fixation + water; implant fixation + a complex of drugs. The duration of the experiment was 30 days. Rats were removed from the experiment by euthanasia under thiopental anesthesia (40 mg/kg) after 30 days by bloodletting from the heart. The use of a therapeutic complex of drugs leads to a significant decrease in the activity of inflammatory markers: after prolonged oral administration of complex drugs, the activity of acid phosphatase decreased by 2.5 times, and elastase – by 1.4 times. This indicates a pronounced anti-inflammatory effect of the treatment complex. The introduction of this treatment complex into clinical practice can help improve the results of implantation treatment by reducing inflammatory complications and increasing the longterm stability of implants. Conclusions. The introduction of this treatment complex into clinical practice can help improve the results of implantation treatment by reducing inflammatory complications and increasing the long-term stability of implants.
References
Paul O., Arora P., Mayer M., Chatterjee S. Inflammation in Periodontal Disease: Possible Link to Vascular Disease. Front Physiol. 2021. № 11. Р. 609614. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2020.609614.
Hasturk H., Kantarci A. Activation and resolution of periodontal inflammation and its systemic impact. Periodontol 2000. 2015. № 69(1). Р. 255-73. doi: 10.1111/prd.12105.
Assery N.M., Jurado C.A., Assery M.K., Afrashtehfar K.I. Peri-implantitis and systemic inflammation: A critical update. Saudi Dent J. 2023. № 35(5). Р. 443-450. doi: 10.1016/j.sdentj.2023.04.005
Anderson J.M. Inflammatory response to implants. ASAIO Trans. 1988. № 34(2).Р. 101-7. doi: 10.1097/00002480-198804000-00005
Goodman S.B., Gallo J., Gibon E., Takagi M. Diagnosis and management of implant debris-associated inflammation. Expert Rev Med Devices. 2020. № 17(1). Р. 41-56. doi: 10.1080/17434440.2020.1702024
Експериментальні методи дослідження стимуляторів остеогенезу / А.П. Левицкий та ін. : методичні рекомендації. Київ : ГФЦ, 2005. – 50 с.
European convention for the protection of vertebrale animals used for experimental and other scientific purposes. – Strasburg. Council of Europe, 1986;123:51.
Наказ України «Про затвердження Порядку проведення науковими установами дослідів, експериментів на тваринах». Міністерство освіти і науки України. 2012. № 249.
Рогач І. М., Керецман А. О., Сіткар А. Д. Правильно вибраний метод статистичного аналізу – шлях до якісної інтерпретації даних медичних досліджень. Науковий вісник Ужгородського університету. 2017. Вип. 2. С. 124-128. Режим доступу: http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/UNUMED_2017_2_27